← All ideas
#014TrendPosition

Gold and silver: monthly MACD and RSI above 55

Monthly chart of gold or silver. Buy when MACD crosses above its signal line and RSI is above 55 in the same month. Exit on a break of the low of the month in which MACD crossed down. According to the author, seven trades in 50 years.

Financial Wisdom · Watch video

Markets

Commodities, Futures

Timeframe

MN

Data

OHLC

Rules

Author's rules

Difficulty

Easy

Status

Untested

The author named entry, exit and parameters.

TradingView ports directly
EasyLanguage has pitfalls
MetaTrader 5 has pitfalls

Idea in brief

The author of the Financial Wisdom channel shows a long-term trend system for gold and silver on the monthly chart. MACD answers whether a trend has started. RSI answers whether the trend is strong enough. A buy happens only when both conditions are met in the same month.

The exit is not an opposite cross. When MACD crosses below its signal line, the author marks the low of that month. The position is closed only when price moves below that low.

The system is out of the market most of the time. According to the author, it was in gold about 28% of the 50 years and in silver about 23%, and the end result is close to simply holding the metal.

Why it might work

The author's explanation is short: the system buys strength. A MACD cross on monthly bars marks the start of a new move. RSI above 55 filters out crosses with no strength behind them. With the 1982 example, the author shows that such crosses without strength are skipped, even if RSI rises above 55 a couple of months later.

The exit through the month's low adds confirmation. A downward cross by itself does not close the position, only a break of the level does. This protects against exiting on a temporary weakening inside a long trend.

The author's argument for the system is about time in the market. The result is close to buy and hold, while capital is free two thirds of the time and can work in other assets.

A caveat about the figures. The 28% a year is calculated only over 14 years in the market, while the 7.3% for buy and hold covers all 50 years. Spreading $313,000 over the full period gives about 7.1% a year (our recalculation from the author's figures), slightly less than buy and hold. Silver shows the same picture. $174,800-178,400 over 11.5 years in the market (23% of 50 years) gives about 28% a year rather than 30%, and about 5.9% a year over the full period versus 6% for buy and hold (our recalculation from the author's figures). The system's real advantage is the smaller drawdown and the free capital, if that capital earns something in the meantime.

Rules

Indicators

// monthly bars, spot gold or silver in dollars per ounce
MACDLine = EMA(Close, 12) - EMA(Close, 26)     // author: MACD 12 26 9, the indicator label on the chart in the video
Signal   = EMA(MACDLine, 9)
RSIm     = RSI(Close, 14)                      // Finetiq: the RSI period is not named and cannot be read on the chart, we use the standard 14

Entry

// checked at the month's close
BullCross = MACDLine[1] <= Signal[1] AND MACDLine > Signal

IF MarketPosition = flat AND BullCross AND RSIm > 55     // author: both conditions in the same month
    BUY AT NEXT BAR OPEN                                 // author: at the open of the next month

// author: entry "at a nominal price above the previous month's close"
// Finetiq: the main variant is at market on the open; for testing, BUY STOP at Close + 1 tick for the whole next month
// author: if RSI reached 55 later than the month of the cross, the trade is not taken and we wait for a new cross

Exit

BearCross = MACDLine[1] >= Signal[1] AND MACDLine < Signal

IF MarketPosition = long AND BearCross
    ExitLevel = Low                           // author: the low of the month in which MACD crossed down

IF ExitLevel defined
    SELL STOP at ExitLevel                    // author: exit when price moves below that low
// Finetiq: the order is active from the open of the next month until filled
// Finetiq: if MACD crossed up again and then down again before the break, ExitLevel = low of the new cross month
// Finetiq: if MACD crossed up and there was no break, the level stays in force (the author does not cover this case)
// the author has no protective stop at entry

Position size (author)

Allocation = 10–20% of the portfolio          // author: share allocated to the strategy
Leverage   = none                             // author: the risk of ruin is high even at 2x leverage

Parameters

Parameter Value Source
Timeframe month author
MACD 12, 26, 9 author (label on the chart in the video)
RSI 14 Finetiq
RSI threshold above 55 in the month of the cross author
Entry open of the next month author
Exit stop at the low of the month of the downward cross author
Moving the exit level low of the latest downward cross Finetiq
Protective stop none author
Data spot, TradingView chart "CFDs on Gold (US$/OZ)" author
Test period 1976–2026 author
Portfolio share 10–20%, no leverage author

What to test

  1. A fair comparison with buy and hold. Calculate the annual return of both curves over all 50 years. Add the return on cash while out of the market, for example from Treasury bills. Without that return, the system does not beat buy and hold by the author's own figures.
  2. RSI threshold. Compare 50, 55, 60 and a variant without RSI. With seven trades, one added or missed entry changes the result many times over. If 55 is noticeably better than its neighbors, it was chosen from history.
  3. Period neighborhood. RSI 9, 14 and 21, MACD 10/22/7, 12/26/9 and 14/30/11. The result should change smoothly, not jump.
  4. More markets. Seven trades give no statistics. Run the same rules unchanged on platinum, copper, crude oil and indices on monthly bars. Look at the median across markets, not the best one.
  5. Weekly timeframe. The same rules on weekly bars. There will be many times more trades, and you can judge whether there is an effect beyond a few long trends.
  6. Exit. Compare the stop at the low of the cross month with an exit right at the downward cross and with an exit on a monthly close below the level. For each variant, calculate how much profit is given back from the trade's peak to the exit.

Platform notes

TradingView (Pine Script)

  • The author built the chart on TradingView, symbol "CFDs on Gold (US$/OZ)" from TVC, monthly bars. The history of this series on the chart in the video starts before 1976, so the test period can be reproduced.
  • ta.macd(close, 12, 26, 9) and ta.rsi(close, 14) match the indicators visible on the author's chart.
  • Exit stop: strategy.exit(..., stop = exitLevel) stays active until filled. If the month opens below the level, the fill will be at the open price.
  • The current monthly bar is not closed until the end of the month. Set alerts on bar close, otherwise a cross that disappears by the end of the month will have time to trigger a signal.

MultiCharts and TradeStation (EasyLanguage)

  • Futures history for gold and silver is stitched together from contracts. MACD and RSI are not distorted by a subtraction-adjusted series, since they are based on price differences. The level of the month's low and the percentage comparison with buy and hold are distorted.
  • MACD(Close, 12, 26), signal line XAverage(MACD(Close, 12, 26), 9), RSI(Close, 14) with Wilder smoothing.
  • Sell next bar at ExitLevel stop lives for one bar, which on a monthly chart is a month. The order has to be sent on every bar while the position is open.
  • A futures daily bar in TradeStation closes at settlement. A month built from such bars also closes at the settlement of the last day, not at the last trade.

MetaTrader 5 (MQL5)

  • In iMACD, the signal line is a simple average, not an EMA. Crosses will shift relative to the author's chart. Take the main line (buffer 0) and calculate the 9 EMA of it yourself.
  • Brokers' monthly bar history for XAUUSD and XAGUSD is usually much shorter than 50 years. An EA on such history will not see most of the author's trades, so testing has to be done on external data.
  • The position is held for years. CFDs on metals charge a swap fee for every night, which adds up to a noticeable amount over four years and is absent from the author's calculation.
  • Calculate the signal on the closed monthly bar (index 1) and check for a new bar.

Where the idea can break

  • Seven trades in 50 years. Such a sample cannot tell a rule from luck: one extra or missed entry changes the result many times over.
  • The rules are shown on the same two markets and the same period on which the result was calculated. The video has no out-of-sample test.
  • The 28% and 30% a year are calculated only on time in the market. Over the full period, the gold strategy gave about 7.1% a year versus 7.3% for buy and hold, and the silver strategy about 5.9% versus 6% (our recalculation). The claimed 30% for silver does not hold even on time in the market: the author's figures give about 28%. The video first presents this as a four- to fivefold advantage, then as almost threefold.
  • The silver figures differ within the video: $174,800 at the start and $178,400 at the end.
  • There is no protective stop, and drawdowns are large: 48% on gold and 78% on silver according to the author. The exit through the month's low can give back a significant part of the move.
  • The video leads to a paid scanner and community. The equity curves are shown as a picture, with no list of trades and dates.
  • The return on cash while out of the market is not included in the calculation. The author mentions "other assets" but does not show what happened with them.

Sources

  • A Simple Gold & Silver Trend Strategy (50 year study) Where next?

    Financial Wisdom

    • 00:22Results over 50 years versus buy and hold
    • 02:20Seven trading actions in 50 years
    • 03:27MACD for the trend, RSI for trend strength
    • 03:50Entry: MACD crosses above the signal line, RSI above 55
    • 04:21Execution at the open of the next month
    • 04:32Exit: break of the low of the month of the downward cross
    • 04:45Example: gold, February 1977 and December 1980
    • 05:43Skipped: the October 1982 cross with RSI below 55
    • 06:00The cross and RSI must coincide in the same month
    • 07:29Drawdowns of the strategy and of buy and hold
    • 08:12Leverage and portfolio share

Author's claims

These figures and statements are the author's. We have not verified them.

  • Period 1976–2026. Gold: $10,000 would have grown to $336,000 with buy and hold over all 50 years (about 7.3% a year) and to $313,000 with the strategy while in the market for about 14 years, which is 28% of the time.
  • The author gives the strategy's return on gold as 28% a year and almost four times higher than buy and hold. Closer to the end of the video, the author speaks of an advantage close to three times.
  • Silver: buy and hold gave $183,000 (about 6% a year), the strategy $174,800 according to the author at the start of the video and $178,400 at the end, with 23% of the time in the market. The strategy's return is 30% a year, which the author says is five times higher than buy and hold.
  • The strategy required trading actions only seven times in 50 years. Whether this is for one metal or both is not specified.
  • Maximum drawdown: on gold 48% for the strategy versus 71% for buy and hold, on silver 78% versus 92%. Excluding the 1980s crashes: gold 25% versus 45%, silver 47% versus 76%.
  • Example: upward cross in February 1977 with a monthly RSI of 55.6, downward cross in December 1980, the month's low at $539, exit in the following month. Over four years, the price rose about fourfold.
  • The latest gold signal came in March 2023. According to the author, by the time of recording the position had gained more than 100%.

Related ideas

Updated: 2026-09-10